How is TMCC’s 2025 shaping up?

This article is intended to help residents to understand the situation at TMCC based on the information we have available. Please read it carefully so you are fully aware of the challenges facing our community. We have a huge problem to solve here in The Meadows and hopefully a better understanding of the details of this situation will give all residents the knowledge and motivation to engage in constructive conversation at Board meetings as well as Town Halls. Although we’ve been able to aggregate the information below, we need a lot more Truth and Transparency.

A reminder of how 2024 went:

Following a $20,000 loss in 2023, in March 2024 the TMCC Treasurer warned TMCC members that there could be cashflow problems during the year (page 7 of link. “Cashflow problems” means TMCC may not have enough cash to pay their bills). This turned out to be an accurate prediction:

2025 is looking worse than 2024

January 2024 weather was cited as a problem last year.
Weather was also bad in January 2025.

TMCC is down 88 annual members from 2024 with an expected net loss of membership dues of $120,000. If seasonal golf memberships don’t increase in February, there will be an additional dues shortfall of $126,000. (Footnote 1) Fewer members will result in fewer rounds and cart fees, but some of this will be offset by higher cart rates for some categories (we don’t have good enough data to reasonably evaluate this amount).

TMCC will need an extra $250,000 of income from operations to repay the loan from MCA in Feb/Mar/Apr.

If TMCC annual snowbird members have concerns about whether TMCC will be operating when they return in the fall, they may discontinue their membership when they depart in the spring to avoid paying dues over the summer (TMCC allows annual members to cancel their membership with 60 days’ notice).

These are the “positives” we are aware of for TMCC:

1.      The Clubhouse being closed saves the TMCC from the losses it usually incurs related to that facility (it is common for even successful private clubs to lose money on their Food and Beverage operations because their client base is limited to members who aren’t numerous enough to make the operation self-sustaining). To be clear: it is a large positive for TMCC that the Clubhouse is not operating. But this is also likely to negatively impact member satisfaction and membership levels. It is clear that the MCA’s goal is to have a clubhouse, these savings are not “sustainable” under the current private club model. 

2.      The Highlands has been in better shape (but still not good). Specifically, only 4 of the front 9 greens are problematic vs about 7 last year. It still has a (deserved) reputation for bad conditioning. We’ve received feedback that some of the conditioning gains are deteriorating as traffic increases and it is “pretty much like last year” (but that is anecdotal).

3.      MCA is now subsidizing TMCC more than they ever have with $223,000 of operating expenses moving from TMCC to MCA for pool and fitness operations. (Although this is a positive for TMCC, it is of course a negative for MCA Homeowners). 

4.      If hurricanes do not disrupt golf rounds in 2025, TMCC will not incur the estimated $100,000 in lost golf revenues.

Overall TMCC needs to improve income by about $470,000 compared to 2024 just to break even on a cashflow basis (eliminate estimated $220,000 loss experienced in 2024 and have an additional $250,000 to pay off the loan).
Based on the information available, this seems very unlikely. 

It would be better for the MCA to be receiving data and information from TMCC, rather than having us piece things together as we are doing. But MCA’s two liaisons to TMCC (MCA President and Treasurer) are a roadblock to the Board receiving it. So, Board members are put in the position of making decisions based on the limited information available. That is far from ideal but better than being hamstrung by having no information. If TMCC would like to dispute the information or observations posted here we would be glad to receive it. But it must be with real facts, information and legitimate forecasts. General statements or saying this info isn’t accurate isn’t helpful. 

If adjusting the lease is on the agenda for the Feb 13 MCA Board meeting (to shift $223,000 of operations of the pool and fitness center from TMCC to MCA), the MCA should require adding a lease term to receive monthly financial information and forecasts from TMCC (this should have always been part of the lease).

The MCA does not have a lot of time to make a major decision and determine its best course of action for its golf courses. In 2024 TMCC required cash assistance in July and 2025 is looking worse. We don’t want to be in the position of being forced to make a snap decision like we did in the fall (MCA Treasurer told the Board their choice was to lend TMCC $250,000 or take over running the golf courses in a couple of weeks). The sooner we start figuring out what MCA should do with its golf courses, the better our chances of making a good decision. (Footnote 2). 

Ballots for the election of 3 MCA Directors have been mailed and you should have received yours by now. Vote for candidates you believe will deal with this issue, and act for the interests of all MCA Homeowners.

Please share this with friends and neighbors.
Contact us at ForTheMeadows@SarasotaMeadows.com

Footnote 1

Link to details of TMCC memberships as of January 2025.

Golf memberships (Jan 2024 vs Jan 2025)

  • Down 56 annual members (from 359 to 303 (“Full” members down 6 to 164))
  • Down $53,000 in annual dues (rate increases averaging 10% ($263,000) offset much of the membership number decreases ($316,000))
  • Having membership down 15% will affect member rounds and cart fees (some will be offset by increased cart fee rates).

Tennis memberships  (Jan 2024 vs Jan 2025)

  • Down 28 annual members (from 196 to 168)
  • Down $80,000 in annual dues (rate increases averaging 2% ($12,000) offset some of the membership number decreases ($92,000))

Social memberships  (Jan 2024 vs Jan 2025)

  • Down 4 annual members (from 89 to 85)
  • UP $13,000 in annual dues (rate increases averaging 11% ($25,000) more than offset some of the membership number decreases ($12,000))

Seasonal Golf memberships (Current Seasonal memberships vs ALL 2024 seasonal memberships)

  • Down 35 seasonal members (from 104 to 69) BUT there may still be new seasonal members added in the next month.
  • Down $126,000 in annual dues but additional seasonal members may join in the next month.

Footnote 2

Director Mark Pienkos attempted to initiate a Strategic Committee to address the future of our golf courses in August 2024 but was unsuccessful. He was eventually successful in December 2024. The deadline for application for the 3 open spots on the Committee closed Jan 27 2025. It is unknown when those Committee members, the 3 MCA Directors and the 3 TMCC Directors will be selected and announced.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

13 responses to “How is TMCC’s 2025 shaping up?”

  1. Jeff Holmes Avatar
    Jeff Holmes

    Excellent! 

    Like

  2. Richard Sommerfeld Avatar
    Richard Sommerfeld

    Well-written and documented. Facts are facts. It’s apparent from the TMCC’s financials that it has been insolvent for 10 years because during that time it has had negative cash flow and negative shareholders’ equity. They can’t hide the numbers. When I gave a letter to Fernando Viteri on 11/11/24 stating that the present and future cash flow from the TMCC would not be sufficient to repay the $250K loan, this proves that if they can repay the loan, they will immediately need to seek another loan to get through the slow summer months. Why this was not apparent to the MCA treasurer is strange.

    According to Article 28 of the lease, the TMCC has been in default of the lease since July of 2024, yet the MCA board has maintained a rather too relaxed attitude to the situation.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Thomas Rudkin Avatar
    Thomas Rudkin

    It is clear that the Club is in serious trouble and will not be able to rebound and recover any losses. I think that the MCA needs to initiate a ‘what if” scenario immediately so that all its owners/members know what the worst case costs will be. Most important is to somehow stabilize membership count which would minimize the overall cost to the owners/members by offering another form of membership. Not sure how this would be done so the MCA needs to include this in their study.

    Like

  4. rainyfortunatelyc38fc97a91 Avatar
    rainyfortunatelyc38fc97a91

    It would be exceedingly helpful to publish a synopsis of everyone running for the MCA board. I certainly WILL NOT vote for any candidate who is a TMCC member as it is a conflict of interest in my opinion. It is time to spend some money to get a study done and FORCE TMCC to open the books for whomever does the study. There are a lot of management companies and as a HOA president, I ALWAYS have multiple entities bid for the business. We will be paving our driveway and parking lots and there was a $34,400 difference in bids with identical parameters. Thank you.

    Gary Pezze
    218-348-5829
    pezzoid@hotmail.com

    Sent from my iPad

    Like

  5. Richard Sommerfeld Avatar
    Richard Sommerfeld

    I’ve gone through the TMCC’s financials back to 2018 as represented in their IRS Form 990. I haven’t seen the actual audited financials but would very much like to. I need to see the auditor’s opinion as to whether the financial statements were “qualified” with notes and IF the auditor included any reference to the TMCC not being a “going concern.” I’ll get to why this is important below.

    When the MCA provided the TMCC with an operating lease, there were no financial or maintenance covenants, nor was there any representation and warranty that the TMCC provide “unqualified” financial statements.

    When the MCA absorbed the TMCC assets into its balance sheet through the purchase of the BB&T loan for $2M+, the Treasurer and the auditor could have revalued the assets of the clubhouse and courses based upon the average of 2 independent valuations. The net effect would have been to increase the residents’ equity in the MCA. This didn’t happen or else it would be referenced in footnote #5 to the balance sheet of the MCA. I only see the assets taken in at the book value at which the TMCC carried them on its balance sheet.

    Under Cl. 28 of the operating lease, if the TMCC moved to restructure or otherwise rework its debts and operations, they would be in default. For the past 10 years the TMCC has been insolvent, according to both accounting and legal definitions because they cannot satisfy their debts as and when they come due. To my understanding, they have moved twice to restructure debts when they received the renaissance program advance and then again when they asked for the $250K loan. Those are clearly events of default that have not been called out by the MCA board.

    My point is that by not calling the TMCC into default when the most egregious debts could not be met in July 2024 and allowing the TMCC to continue operating and incurring further debts, without a formal letter of default from the MCA, a reasonable legal argument could be made by the TMCC creditors that the MCA could be liable for those debts. Why? Because the MCA knew the TMCC was insolvent and it still allowed the TMCC to use the MCA’s assets. Ergo, it could be assumed that the liabilities of the TMCC, because no action was taken by the MCA, could ipso facto be the responsibility of the MCA. This presents the MCA board with an accounting and legal conundrum. The MCA can notify the TMCC that it is in default without cancelling the lease. It could give the TMCC a cure period. A default should have certainly been called by the MCA with a reservation of rights.

    Also, Cavanaugh, the MCA auditor, made no mention that the leasee had cash flow problems. Why not? The auditor can only account for what it is shown. If this information was knowingly withheld from the auditor, the MCA has created a problem for itself.

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      It is our understanding that:
      * TMCC members do not receive the audited financial statements
      * TMCC Finance Committee does not receive the audited financial statements
      * TMCC members may view the audited financial statements through an appointment with the Controller, but are not allowed to make/take copies.
      Until a year ago, no one was even aware that their income statement and balance sheet were available via their Form 990 submissions to the IRS.
      At the recent Townhall Meeting of the MCA, the MCA President indicated that the new TMCC President is committed to Transparency and that he would be “fully open about TMCC’s Finances and so forth”. She said we could contact him to obtain Financial information.
      The TMCC President will be speaking at the upcoming MCA Board meeting. Perhaps someone could ask him to confirm what information he will provide to residents and how they can obtain it. We’d love to see their 2023 audited financial statements and their most current monthly cashflow forecast for starters.

      Like

  6. Richard Sommerfeld Avatar
    Richard Sommerfeld

    We one looks back at the TMCC directors at the time the TMCC defaulted on its loan from BB&T and then the bailout by the MCA, please note the following. This information is pertinent because the TMCC has been insolvent for about 10 years and its financial statements filed with the IRS confirm that fact.

    Company directors in Florida can be held liable if they continue to operate a business while knowingly insolvent. While Florida does not have a specific statute that explicitly prohibits “trading while insolvent” like some other jurisdictions, directors have fiduciary duties, including the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. If they knowingly continue operating the company, even an LLC, while it cannot pay its debts, they may be personally liable under several legal principles:

    1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty – Directors must act in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders. If they continue operations while insolvent and worsen the company’s financial condition, creditors may sue them for breach of fiduciary duty.
    2. Fraudulent or Wrongful Trading – If directors take on new debts they know the company cannot repay, creditors could claim fraudulent misrepresentation. Florida law (under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act) allows creditors to challenge transactions made with intent to defraud.
    3. Piercing the Corporate Veil – If directors abuse the corporate structure by commingling funds or engaging in reckless business practices, courts may hold them personally responsible for corporate debts.
    4. Personal Liability for Certain Debts – In some cases, directors may be personally liable for unpaid taxes (e.g., payroll taxes) or for personally guaranteeing business debts.

    Like

  7. Nora M Kelly Avatar
    Nora M Kelly

    Has there been any thoughts or concerns about a new building being built and “reclassified “ so that is no longer a private club but an equally shared facility so that the MCA can charge all residents to pay for its construction and on going operations. Much like the Fitness and Lifestyle and Wellness Center.

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      As any new building will be paid for by all MCA Homeowners, we agree that any new building should serve the WHOLE Meadows community, not just the private club.

      Like

  8. John Dolcetti Avatar
    John Dolcetti

    what happened to the members who guaranteed the $250000. loan? Has that money been paid to the McA.?

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      Repayments are due in Feb ($100k), Mar ($100k) and Apr ($50k) (probably at month-end but we don’t know that)

      Like

      1. John Dolcetti Avatar
        John Dolcetti

        Thanks for all your hard work, much appreciated!Sent from my iPhone

        Like

Leave a reply to John Dolcetti Cancel reply