Video of MCA Special Meeting + Sample Comment

Yesterday’s MCA Special Meeting to “Consideration and vote on a
Short-Term Loan Request from The Meadows Country Club” was a lively one. The MCA Board was to consider and vote on (it was to be a Board vote, not an MCA Homeowner vote) at loan to TMCC as follows (info provided at the meeting):

$250,000 loan @ 5% interest. To be repaid as follows:
$100,000 in February
$100,000 in March
$50,000 in April
The Treasurer mentioned a 5% “penalty” for late payment. 5% = $12,500
The Chair indicated that they had consulted with their bankers and lawyers and believe the MCA is legally allowed to loan TMCC money, but did not provide any by-law or statute reference.
The Treasurer indicated that TMCC needs funds to make payroll immediately and for the remainder of the year.

As a result of MCA Homeowner feedback, the MCA Board voted to “table” the loan motion which means they deferred voting on it. There will need to be another Board meeting to vote on it or some other loan proposal.

There will be commentary and discussion in a later post, but we wanted to share this info as well as a video provided by an attendee and a sample of the MCA Homeowner comments:

LINK to meeting video

The following remarks made by an MCA homeowner are typical of many of the MCA Homeowner comments made at the meeting.


What we have heard here today confirms the validity of my objections to the MCA Board decisions for the last two years.

It has been obvious for at least two years, that TMCC does not have a business model that is self-sustainable.

Beginning in 2014, TMCC was losing money at the rate of $1 million per year and by 2017/2018, TMCC was confronted with filing for bankruptcy.

At that time, we the Meadows residents, were told that in order to maintain the greenspace and maintain our home values, we needed to secure the financing of TMCC.

This was approved by a vote of the Meadows Community and the MCA Homeowners were forced to pay $6 million dollars to buy the golf course, tennis facility, pool, dining and other buildings.

The Meadows Homeowners own TMCC facilities and these operations may be run without any involvement of TMCC.

In addition, the MCA Board agreed to a 3 year lease of all these assets with TMCC at “favorable terms” of an annual lease payment of $10/yr in order to allow TMCC to gets financial house in order. TMCC still bled cash annually and could not pay its bills. Any yet, the MCA BOD agreed to a new three year lease at $10/yr, without demanding any changes be made to TMCC or its operations or its business model. And the MCA BOD added the new fitness center to TMCC lease! Thus the MCA BOD failed it fiduciary duty to protect the Meadows Community assets.

In 2021, the MCA spent an additional $2 million improving TMCC private golf course and clubhouse dining room, which are exclusive for TMCC member use.

In 2022-23, the MCA spent $4 million on the lifestyle and wellness center and gave the fitness portion of the center to TMCC as part of the $10/yr lease, while receiving nothing in return. In addition, the Board voted to pay TMCC $600,000 per year for the right to use the fitness portion even though the Community owns these assets.

In 2024, in the face of continued financial losses by TMCC, the MCA BOD agreed to a new three year lease at an increased lease rate of $65,000/yr,
(A)without demanding any changes be made to TMCC or its operations or its business model, and
(B) without demanding that the Meadows Community owned assets of TMCC be maintained properly. TMCC could not pay their bills when they were paying a $10/yr lease rate, how in the world did the BOD believe that TMCC would suddenly be able to pay even this modest lease rate?

Thus, time and time again, the MCA BOD failed its fiduciary duty to protect the Meadows Community assets….. without transparency and without accountability.

Each of these additional expenditures beyond the initial purchase of TMCC assets, were not voted on by the Community, and necessitated the MCA to take out additional loans, were not voted on by the Community.

Bottom line: The business model of TMCC has not and does not generate enough cash on its own to pay their own way since 2014…..

….which has necessitated time and time again, that the entire residents of the Meadows subsidize TMCC operations.

When does this stop?

When does TMCC pay its own way.

TMCC management has proven inept in managing its own operations and it is past time to fire them!

It is past time for the Meadows community to stop being the private bank for TMCC.

If the business model of TMCC is sustainable, let them secure private financing and pay us back in the next 60 days.

TMCC managers have proven to be incompetent and the business model has proven to be broken.

The MCA BOD have failed to uphold their fiduciary obligations to the Meadows Community. And now you want $2 million more to build TMCC a new clubhouse when they did not maintain and protect our assets over the last five years, and their business model continues to run in the red?

It is past time to follow my recommendation of the last two years and hire a consultant who has expertise in operating a private country club profitably and make the necessary changes to restore profitably.

In addition, I would ask that a committee of Meadows residents, voted on by the community, would secure and work with the consultant and make the necessary detailed recommendations for changes to be made to TMCC operations for a self-sustainable future.

The MCA BOD should not be part of the consultancy process….

…because of your continued individual and group failures, lack of transparency, lack of integrity, and conflicts of interest have disqualified you from this process.



Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

16 responses to “Video of MCA Special Meeting + Sample Comment”

  1. Roy Baty Avatar
    Roy Baty

    I hope the MCA will explore the possibility of starting a tree nursery on some of the land from the golf courses.

    The two of the largest expenses are already covered by existing infrastructure:

    1. Land purchase.
    2. Watering expense.

    In addition, this solution does not involve residential development, something which is bound to be unpopular.

    A quick google search says that tree nurseries can generate up to $80,000 net profit, per acre!

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      We believe the MCA should make every reasonable effort to make the golf courses successful. So far they have only tried one: subsidizing TMCC who continues on the path they were up to their impending insolvency. The costs and subsidies are only going to increase for MCA Homeowners as TMCC can’t afford to maintain the facilities and they continue to degrade.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. inspiringdfa1f87109 Avatar
        inspiringdfa1f87109

        I completely agree that the MCC is not well managed now and could do better. However, keep in mind that it is right across the street from a newly refurbished public club, (Bobby Jones), which has better greens, better fairways, better tees, which does not have to pay taxes, and which, by definition, does not even need to run at a profit.

        No matter how well the MCC is managed, it is tough to compete with that!

        Like

  2. Robert Zepik Avatar
    Robert Zepik

    When Private golf courses have money issues they charge the members everywhere but here. This is Crazy. In high season last year in AM the charged like $82 Renaissance Members (Joke in itself) for Highlands which is a joke. How do other golf courses in area Pay for golf courses and charge less. Other courses must make $. Can we look at books where $ goes? How do we do business with this operation that does not make $ for 10 years. How can you expect to operate Business which loses $ year after Year?

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      TMCC is very tight on financial info with their Members let alone MCA Homeowners. In the 2018-2024 leases MCA Board didn’t even get reasonable financial info from TMCC. The complete absence of any reasonable level of transparency is astounding.

      Like

  3. Tim Thomas Avatar
    Tim Thomas

    As a MCA resident I would hate to see the golf courses sold to a condo developer, and as a MCC tennis member I would hate to see the tennis courts close. That being said, 90% of what Don says above is correct. The MCC is trying to pursue a flawed business model by operating (and maintaining) three golf courses. Giving them more money to continue down that path is not sustainable.

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      Demand for golf is at a VERY high level right now and has been growing since 2020. So if you can’t run golf courses successfully you are doing something wrong. TMCC’s private Club model is likely the problem. But MCA needs to hire professional experts to figure it out (as well as what to do with the clubhouse before spending $3.6 million on it).

      Like

      1. inspiringdfa1f87109 Avatar
        inspiringdfa1f87109

        I believe that Bobby Jones does not even have a clubhouse (although they are discussing one.) And they are able to charge over $80 per 18 holes.

        Also it seems to me when I drive past it on Circus Blvd, there is a lot more carts on the course than there is at the Meadows.

        Like

  4. mk Avatar
    mk

    Agreed 101% !!!

    Like

  5. Kathy mart Avatar
    Kathy mart

    The meadows golf course is a money pit .unload the golf course an build some luxury homes . Golf courses are a dying thing that only a few people like .
    stop raising are fees to pay for something most of us don’t want.

    Like

    1. Website Admin Avatar

      Agree that the community should not be paying for part of the costs of maintaining a private club for a small number of MCA Homeowners and many from outside the MCA.

      Converting any of the golf courses to homes would be a very difficult thing for the community, especially those backing on to those particular golf holes. Demand for golf is actually at very high and growing levels since 2020. Keeping the courses open should be possible. But they have to be operated very differently.

      Like

  6. lisi5f0a56d8f76 Avatar
    lisi5f0a56d8f76

    I approached Tony Johnson about four or five years ago with an idea to generate more income at the Pro Shop. There’s no place for a golfers to come after they finish their golf and drop off the carts to get a quick beer, a cocktail or light bites. (yes, there is the place across the street at the tennis courts… But this would be a place where they have an audience literally driving up to the door ) I suggested setting up a catering station with a portable bar and chaffers for food. As a Private Chef I frequent am asked to consult on these kind of projects. He and the Golf Pro at the time said no they’re not interested. It would be a great revenue stream for the country club. Right now there’s no fun place for golfers to come and celebrate their wins and drown their sorrows. Especially because the country club has all the catering equipment! I’d be happy to be on a committee to look into anything like that

    Like

  7. Sandra Strauss Avatar
    Sandra Strauss

    Thank you for providing this platform for keeping residents informed, much needed for all in making informed decisions.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Jimmy Lawson Avatar
    Jimmy Lawson

    Thanks for your help

    Like

  9. lisi5f0a56d8f76 Avatar
    lisi5f0a56d8f76

    has anyone thought to contact the media? Have them do an in depth investigation?

    Like

  10. […] Video of MCA Oct 30 Special Meeting + Sample Comment […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Website Admin Cancel reply